Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triangle Town Center
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Current consensus is that malls are not inherently notable... We could use a guideline to determine what makes a shopping mall notable, but I doubt this would meet the vast majority of editors' standards. Grandmasterka 03:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another mall with no claim to notability. Website shows the usual rundown of retailers. We already have an article on cookie-cutter malls: shopping malls. ~ trialsanderrors 02:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with a sigh... yet another fantastic mall article... Pascal.Tesson 06:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Alphachimp talk 07:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-Doesn't this fall under CSD A7? --Wine Guy Talk 10:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Was prodded and deprodded. Opinions about malls aren't uniform, so I thought it would be better off here. ~ trialsanderrors 10:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, verifiable. Note that malls aren't covered under A7, only people, clubs, or bands. Alternately, merge to North Raleigh. JYolkowski // talk 16:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment while it's true that malls cannot be speedily deleted, they can still be deleted per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Pascal.Tesson 00:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per JYolkowski. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 07:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just because something is real does not make it instantly notable or worthy or a Wikipedia article. The only claim of notability was tacked on by a user whom removed the prod[1], just for this discussion. The user whom wrote it, most likely doesn't know about this mall, also the one line claim to notability, which is extremely weak, is unsourced. There is nothing unique or notable about this mall. I think using critea from WP:BIO, is an excellent way to assess the notability of nearly anything. The only coverage this mall got was for being a mall, and that coverage is not about anything notable but about stores and the like. If the mall could prove it was notable like, say Mall of America, then yes this would be notable. However, just existing is not reason to keep an article that barely asserts importance. Yanksox 12:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Yanksox Davidpdx
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.