Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tri-City area (Alameda County, California)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tri-City area (Alameda County, California) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not an administrative area, no sources found to indicate significance beyond it existing. no redirect needed, as this entire name is too long a search term. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - From my experience in transportation, there are a couple of reasons why these three cities are identified as one region. 1) These three cities don't belong to the main AC Transit district. Union City has its own bus system. Newark and Fremont belong to AC Transit under a separate funding agreement. 2) They are located on the Dumbarton bridge corridor and belong to regional committees that plan for improvement projects on that corridor. However they're not notable and very much WP:FANCRUFT. This designation is also too similar to the Tri-Valley area in the same county, which is far more notable and recognized in the media. Acnetj (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.