Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Ludwig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Ludwig[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This player fails all notability criteria for ice hockey players. Iheartthestrals (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- does not pass either WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 02:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as perhaps nothing better for a notable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 19:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately he falls just short of passing WP:NHOCKEY and a quick search on him doesn't make it look like he can pass GNG either as the articles that mention him are just routine sports coverage. Deadman137 (talk) 23:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the "Personal" section of Craig Ludwig. That section should also be updated, possibly through merging some of the material from this article (e.g., his NHL draft status). Rlendog (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - fails GNG and NHOCKEY. Also opposed to redirecting. Reso lute 17:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Also oppose redirect. Information presented is not relevant to father's page. Another link: Tyler Ludwig deletion discussion. Thanks. Iheartthestrals {talk) 00:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.