Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Clark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Clark[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No non-commerical references found during web search. No mention in reliable second-party sources. One possibly notable achivement seems to be having taken some early photographs of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We're told He has recently unearthed photographs of the Beatles and Rolling Stones from 1963 from his archive. These photos had never been seen, and Trevor is making them available as limited editions. When a museum buys a set or the photographic press remarks on these photos or a book of them comes out, an article may be deserved. Till then though, delete. -- Hoary (talk) 02:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's WP:SPAM for some photos he's trying to sell. And the photos fall under WP:CRYSTAL. Qworty (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.