Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tregunter Road

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tregunter Road[edit]

Tregunter Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An ordinary residential street with no claim to notability. The only statement in the article which is cited to a source is a statement about what the area was called before this road was built, so there is no source at all actually about Tregunter Road, even after the article was tagged for sources for almost five years. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - this article does not actually say what is notable enough about this street to distinguish it from other residential roads. Vorbee (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No different to any other residential road in London. Anyway fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 21:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the article does not offer any evidence show that the street has any more notability than any other. Looks like a clear case of failing GNG. Dunarc (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.