Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treasure chest (video games)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge with Power-up. Marasmusine (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Treasure chest (video games)[edit]

Non-notable original research. Miremare 00:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly isn't sourced, but I'm not sure OR is appropriate. I created the article because I kept wanting to link "treasure chest" in game articles. The same could be said of "monsters". Whether it links to its own article or a section of an article doesn't matter to me. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 17:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: NN, too broad anyways. It is plain OR. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Miremare 02:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Deserves a mention under video game, not a whole article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Belongs with video game with WP:RS. Per Judgesurreal777, it does not warrants its own article. Wisdom89 (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not even sure it needs to be mentioned in video game. I don't know if there's a more specific article to hold it. Pagra shtak 15:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to video game. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 17:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Power-up, else delete. Not much more to be said than some video games have power-ups in treasure chests and some don't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Power-up seems to be a more logical merger if there ever was one. Wisdom89 (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Starblind. --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability - what's next, an article on houses in video games? Come on. - Chardish (talk) 23:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Too broad; would be far too difficult to establish notability of any kind. --Scottie_theNerd 23:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Condense (to two or three sentences), and Merge to Power-up, would fit nicely into the "Attaining power-ups" section. Fin ©™ 17:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds reasonable. If consensus is to merge, this is how it should be done. Pagra shtak 19:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Treasure chests in fiction are a well-worn cliche, that nature of this can be documented at the treasure chest article. If a treasure chest is more than a box with stuff in to any particular videogame and is genuinely of interest then it can be covered in the game's article. I'm not quite getting this power-up merge/redirect, surely treasure chests are as likely to contain equipment or currency in an RPG as they are to contain power-ups in action games? Someone another (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.