Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Van Winkle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Xoloz 01:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actor who has made single episode appearances in several TV series. BanyanTree 02:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. He's a beginning actor; give the article a chance to grow. Sr13 02:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Sr13. Just because the article isn't much now doesn't mean that it can't get better. - Lex 03:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn, minor actor and model. Eusebeus 15:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nn, unsourced. --Aaron 16:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep after having a look at the imdb page. Decent amount of acting work. Enough for an article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Looks to me like it just merits an article. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 03:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Minor actor (though who can forget his stellar work as "Frat Guy" in Dorm Daze 2?). WP is NOT IMDB Lite, and all the minor movie-star-wannabes putting in their (short) CVS is just as bad as non-notable companies and unread webcomics trying to sneak their way into a little free publicity. --Calton | Talk 04:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete He looks like he might be on his way to doing something notable, but he's not done it yet. Best of luck to him in his career and may it one day reach a level of encyclopaedic success. GassyGuy 04:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Lex. --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 15:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete When searching for his name he seems to only show up in directories that include all actors. I could not find any critical reviews or fan clubs. I would say this article is not notable enough for inclusion. HighInBC 18:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.