Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Brorsen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --MCB (talk) 06:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Travis Brorsen[edit]
- Travis Brorsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Meets no WP:ENTERTAINER criteria - actor's roles are all, so far as I'm aware, more or less inconsequential. No indication of media coverage (and having an IMDB page isn't about to qualify as that). Also at present unreferenced, and the only biographical information is copied and pasted (without attribution) from IMDB. These latter two issues aren't grounds for deletion. I'm just venting. However, the page author's refusal to remove the copied and pasted section (opting to just silence it and all other templates without actually addressing their problems) may constitute a copyright violation issue. I don't know what copypasting from IMDB falls under. Vianello (talk) 05:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per failing to meet the criteria mentioned above. The author of the article also has many other AfD discussions on his talk page. We don't need Wikipedia being junked up with utter nonsense, such as this trivial bit actor. -Jrcla2 (talk)(contribs) 05:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not even an IMdB?!MY♥INchile 06:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Response. No, he has an IMDB page. Though nothing else. - Vianello (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actors of this individual's notability are not even seldom afforded articles. seems like a self-promo or obsessed fan fueled article, lean towards delete fails wp:bMY♥INchile 18:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not even an IMdB?!MY♥INchile 06:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now. If this actor does something significant, then the article can be re-created. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.