Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Bishop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Travis Bishop[edit]
- Travis Bishop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PERP. The person has had some media coverage, but all of it has been connected to his crime. He was completely non-notable before his crime and has done nothing notable since his crime. Every bit of significant coverage I could find was related to the criminal action. Also a general lack of persistent coverage. Could probably make a WP:BLP1E pitch as well. He's out of jail, the media barely noticed his release. His 15 minutes are over. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above, I just dont see having a bio on every war resistor or deserter even if they get a news article. Most of the citations in this article are somewhat suspect. Perhaps there is somewhere we could merge this article? Bonewah (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The United States military lists that there are several thousand deserters since 2001, what makes this individual more notable than them. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 21:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable IMO, per the nomination. — AustralianRupert (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.