Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency (Guatemala)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transparency (Guatemala)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With no sources or even wikilinks, this article fails to meet WP:GNG, and it is impossible to know by reading this article is it is actually real. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 05:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. I suspect the article is real, but so far no sources. Kitfoxxe (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Guatemalan general election, 2003. The European Union Electoral Observation Mission final report confirms it got 1.09% of the vote and 0% of the seats, but it was nowhere to be seen in the 2007 election.[1] A textbook case of BLP1E (biography of a little party, 1 election). Clarityfiend (talk) 07:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ^{talk to me!} 09:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Party hasn't done anything notable, considering it did not appear in following elections, it is unlikely it will in future. 1292simon (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.