Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmutation circle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fullmetal Alchemist . No independent notability shown. I will evaluate the protection request by Farix separately on its merits. j⚛e deckertalk 01:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transmutation circle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable in-universe term from the series Fullmetal Alchemist. Should not have an article. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can you specify why you think it's not notable? Other universes have their own in terms. Look at Lord of the Rings. Gregkaye (talk) 12:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are several possibilities. The articles regarding in-universe Lord of the Rings materials may have received more out of universe coverage (critical analysis, scientific interest etc). It could also be possible that the other articles could have been overlooked and that they should be merged or deleted as well. I suggest that its better to provide evidence that the Transmutation circle is notable that rely on other articles that could very well be unnotable too.--67.68.160.163 (talk) 20:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.