Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformers: Generations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers: Generations[edit]

Transformers: Generations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article, simply treated as a catalogue of toys. TTN (talk) 01:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 01:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • How many of these have their own articles still? Is there a bot that counts how many links an article has that aren't redirects? If enough valid links remain, then this can simply be renamed List of Transformer Generation characters. Lists of Transformers characters shows a lot of list exist. Can a single list be made listing all of them with columns listing what toy line, cartoon series, etc, they were in? Dream Focus 01:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per WP:NOTCATALOG. It is not a list of characters per se, but a list of toys that happens to link to the characters.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is simply a catalogue of toys; providing lists of released toys sorted by class/line/movie/whatever should be Hasbro's job, not Wikipedia's. Checking the sources in the article, it's obvious that TFW2005 is a fansite and OAFE is a blog. Those make 20/25 links. Then there's Hasbro (not independent) and more blogs - none of this counts towards notability. I could not find better sources to cover the topic so I'd say it fails GNG. RetiredDuke (talk) 23:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.