Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformational Quality (TQ) Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transformational Quality (TQ) Theory[edit]
- Transformational Quality (TQ) Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable theory of education. I can't find much on it. I can't even find the books that are supposed references for the article. A search for "Living theory press" brings up this very Wikipedia article. Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:21, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Searching for "Transformational Quality Theory" brings up two pages, both non-academic pages by "WJ Barry". "Barry, W" is also the author of two of the supposed references for the article. This appears to be just someone's pet social science theory that is not mainstream or accepted by the social science community. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable theory, no independent coverage found. May perhaps become notable in the future, but currently isn't. Atkins and Wallace might be a valid source, but has not yet been published.Yunshui 雲水 07:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking sufficient evidence of notability. As always, I would be happy to reconsider if new or additional evidence is provided. ElKevbo (talk) 08:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Very vague definition - not even enough to warrant a Stub classification much less indicate notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.