Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tramonto Circuits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tramonto Circuits

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Ref 1 is a promotional press release, ref 2 is general coverage about Flexible Electronics and does not cover this company significantly, ref 3 is an interview, whereas ref 4 is another press release from PR Web. None of the sources meet WP:CORPDEPTH, my search didn't find CORPDEPTH-meeting material so this should be deleted. VickKiang (talk) 02:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 02:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The company does not appear to be notable. The contributor is listed as the website designer. Appears to be promotional.
Constant314 (talk) 03:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alternate outcome—It might be suitable to add this company to List of EDA companies, although that list does not appear to have an 'electronics manufacturing companies' section, but it does have an 'electronics distribution companies' section. I agree that a standalone article for this company is not justified based on notability. I am just thinking that there might be some 'home' for a mention of the firm in another article. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 03:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:PROMO. My search for sources finds more press releases, the company website, LinkedIn profile, Indeed, Crunchbase, YouTube channel, and regurgitated press releases on low-quality websites, and an interview with the president/owner. Beccaynr (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I'd be down with Ceyockey's suggestion of adding the company in List of EDA companies. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 04:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - from my view, per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:ADS (and similarly, WP:FAILCORP), there do not appear to be sufficiently independent sources to support a merge at this time. Beccaynr (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC) - update comment to reference WP:FAILCORP - Beccaynr (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.