Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainer Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trainer Tower[edit]

Totally NN part of a Pokemon game. No context as of this writing, and not even notable enough for a merge. (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U • T • C | M • E )} 20:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Wickethewok 20:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's essentially a subpage of Shiny Pokémon, which is the only page that links to it.--Kchase T 20:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Don't you think there should be a page for this though? There should be a page for trainer tower, to describe what it is and strategy to get through it.

0-172 1.42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment No, I do not. See WP:NOT. This is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U • T • C | M • E )} 20:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, gaming strategy is never supposed to be including in a Wikipedia article, regardless of the location/scenario/dungeon's notability. I wouldn't claim to be any sort of authority on the notability of this particular article, but strategy is right out. Icewolf34 20:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Somebody created a link to this page, therefore intending fore there to be a page about this topic. So I created it. Now, I do admit to having meager information on the particular subject. I also have to admit, that with having meager information about this subjct there really is not point in making it, but there was a link to this page, so I decided to create this page for anybody curious about this subject. But the page seems to be in violation of some rule, so I am not clear about what to do. 0-172 1:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 20:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- It shouldnt' have been linked in the first place. It's too non-notable for there to be any non-game guide information about it, and WP:NOT a game guide, so that's right out. --PresN 20:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If it is at all relevant to this discussion, I was considering also making a page for Trainer Hill of Pokemon Emerald, but due to the reaction of and discussion over the Trainer Tower page, I am finding that as not such a good idea. 0-172 2:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment Yeah, that would probably be a very bad idea since they're almost identical concepts. (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U • T • C | M • E )} 21:11, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Pokémon Emerald. It's a minor part of that game, but it doesn't bear more than a sentence, tops, in that article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 21:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. --Peephole 21:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, this can't be necessary. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 00:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment From where I stand right now, the Trainer Tower article is unnecessary, but still needed. How about merging the information I provided about the Trainer Tower with the Seven Island section of the Sevii Islands article. 0-172 6:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Note I do want to delete, but here's what should happen: Trainer Tower becomes a dab to Sevii Islands and Pokemon Emerald, and information is consolidated into new or existing sections of this article. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 03:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thats what I just said . 0-172 1:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.