Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tradinista!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tradinista!

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is, by its own admission, about a private chat group that created a website in 2016, which was taken down after a few months. The claim to notability is that it was mentioned in a NYTimes OpEd and an editor at a different publication expressed support for the group in a blogpost. A short-lived internet group with a couple of mentions hardly passes muster under WP:ORGCRITE.

Furthermore, the article violates WP:GNG, in that it cites only (a) opinion pieces, (b) blogposts without editorial oversight (neither of which meet the verifiability guidelines under WP:SOURCES), and (c) articles authored by primary sources involved in the subject matter of the article. A single mention in a single NY Times OpEd plus a handful of blog posts hardly seems to constitute a reliable basis for notability. Additionally, from previous PROD dated 27 July 2018, by 53backes:

This page is for a movement that does not meet the notability requirements for an organization, as all discussions of the organization are confined to a one month window. Added to this is that only one person performed any substantial effort over the course of the past year in contributing to it.

The article has been tagged as "non-notable" without any new sources cited or substantial change in content for over two years. It appears to be the solo project of a single editor. Thorshammer595 (talk) 02:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- A discussion group existing from Oct. 2016 to some date in 2017 is clearly NN, even if its archive remains available on the Internet. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.