Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Greer Gipson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tracy Greer Gipson[edit]
- Tracy Greer Gipson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable professor - fails WP:PROF StAnselm (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There seems to be no way in which notability is established. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:40, 6 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. The article presents no evidence of passing WP:PROF nor WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not appear to pass either WP:BIO or WP:PROF. The books that he authored have minimal library holdings according to WorldCat[1][2], only 5 hits in GoogleBooks[3]. Nsk92 (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for all the good reasons given above. Not notable by a long shot. Drmies (talk) 01:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.