Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Dildy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Skomorokh 16:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tracy Dildy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject clearly does not merit inclusion under WP:ATHLETE. My review of the above-captioned {{find sources}} does not give rise to the conclusion that he meets the GNG (happy for someone to point to specific references (not to search results) that indicate otherwise. Bongomatic 06:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An assistant coach at lower level is not notable. By the way, please decide if he is called Didly or Dildy - the two spellings alternate in the article. McMarcoP (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per McMarcoP and the fact he never made it to a higher level than Collge Basketball. Ilikepie2221 (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because notability has not been established through independent WP:RS regardless of level.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Adequate time given to provide reliable references by which notability would be established. None were given. Pknkly (talk) 07:30, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.