Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracey Milburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tracey Milburn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources I could find include this, which offers some coverage, but is partly a primary source with a lot of the content being straight quotes, and this, which just states that she committed to Pepperdine back when she was in high school, and does not offer significant coverage. The rest of the sources on the article itself are just passing mentions, except this, which is a primary source from UCLA itself. Overall, does not pass GNG and does not warrant an individual article. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and California. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree to above. Sources do not offer significant coverage or are primary. IcanandIwillwatchme (talk) 07:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis. While the LA Times piece on her UCLA and high school career is useful, I don't see consistent coverage that would allow a GNG pass. Jogurney (talk) 16:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.