Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toxic Girl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 & all that shizz (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic Girl[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Prodded and prod removed. Richhoncho (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - It's charted, which meets point one of WP:NSONG. Also being used in the commercial and Shallow Hal are indications of notability. I was able to add the chart position and source it, and I was able to source the use in the movie to IMDB and What-Song.com, although I'm not happy about the quality of those sources. ~~I was able to confirm the use in the AT&T ad, but only via discussion forums which are even less WP:RS than IMDB, so I haven't found a source for those.~~ (I have found a source for the AT&T ad in Entertainment Weekly.) Overall, I'm not seeing much in the way of in-depth discussion of the song in anything resembling a RS. I did find some reviews of the album which devote a couple sentences to praise for the song. Overall, this seems to be a borderline call, but charting pushes it to keep for me. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 23:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have also found reference in Time to it being considered for the soundtrack to 500 Days of Summer and have added a sourced sentence to the article about that. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per ONU, meets WP:NSONG.—UY Scuti ^Talk 15:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination, per snow, and more importantly, all the great work done by ONUnicorn.--Richhoncho (talk) 12:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.