Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tox (Python testing wrapper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Copy-paste reprisal nomination by User:Charmk in response to his article being deleted. WP:POINT applies. No view on the underlying point. Stifle (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tox (Python testing wrapper)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so it fails GNG Charmk (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Charmk (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Charmk (talk) 19:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep This is an obscure topic. And this {[1], [2] (Charmk is the only editor to the article PWCT (software))} followed immediately by [3] is an obvious bad-faith reprisal AfD. Now maybe Charmk has developed a sudden interest in Python. But I rather doubt that. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm helping Wikipedia by discovering articles that doesn't belong to the encyclopedia, and this is one of them, please list references for notability because I can't find them. Charmk (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, listing software articles at AfD seems to be the only thing you do. Do you select all of them by picking those created by people who've just !voted keep at one of your AfDs? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia contains thousands of articles that fail GNG and must be deleted, I discovered a lot of these articles during the last years, and I'm trying to help Wikipedia by removing these articles, if an article is good and pass GNG, I will not open a deletion discussion, let us focus on helping Wikipedia (This is my goal) Charmk (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thousands of articles. You just happened to pick this one. Yeah. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! You are the main contributor to the article! I'm sorry, if you are sure that this a notable topic and you will improve the article I will be happy to withdraw the nomination for deletion, but please tell me why the article topic is notable? Charmk (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Oh! You are the main contributor to the article!" Oh, don't pretend. You're fooling no-one. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Why you are attacking me instead of proving the article notability? because you know that the article topic is not notable Charmk (talk) 21:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and BTW, we generally notify the author(s) of articles when AfDing them. Why didn't you? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry and thanks for the information, I'm new to the process, I started doing this (submitting articles for deletion), 2 days ago. Charmk (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep- this is quite obviously a revenge nom. We shouldn't reward that kind of thing. However, looking at the article, it is indeed badly sourced crap and might not survive a good faith AfD, so no prejudice against speedy renomination. Reyk _YO! 07:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What! I'm really surprised, we are here to improve Wikipedia according to guidelines and policy, this topic doesn't deserve an article in Wikipedia, voting for Keep just to attack me and ignore my contribution is not fair at all, I respect you and I respect Andy Dingley too, please show some respect for my useful contributions. Charmk (talk) 08:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.