Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touro College Los Angeles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Touro College and University System. Spartaz Humbug! 22:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Touro College Los Angeles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. While independent accredited universities are generally considered to be notable per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, this isn't an independent university, but rather part of the Touro College and University System. The sources currently cited by the article are either not independent, not reliable, or not secondary, and I was unable to find additional coverage searching on the internet and on Newspapers.com. I would suggest that this article should be redirected to Touro College and University System signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - not only is notability met, but it seems that this seems to be the standard across Wikipedia to include fully independent schools within a university system. Alansohn (talk) 17:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Alansohn, could you clarify which sources you think establish notability? By my assessment I haven't been able to find a single example of independent coverage in a secondary reliable source. signed, Rosguill talk 17:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - not only is notability met, but it seems that this seems to be the standard across Wikipedia to include fully independent schools within a university system. signed, GTFLETCH
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 05:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.