Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toufik Boushaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Toufik Boushaki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article for scientist who fails WP:PROF. The most cited article of his has only 54 citations--and the others in order are 19, 18, 18, 16, ... The awards do not have any international recognition. DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't appear to meet WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. – Joe (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only 283 cites in a well cited field [1] fails WP:Prof#C1. There is nothing else. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The listed awards do not appear significant enough for notability and there is nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.