Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tototheism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 16:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tototheism[edit]

Delete, neologism, one Google hit.-gadfium 03:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable, maybe original research, non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Seems to be reinvention of pantheism or Spinoza's God. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 04:31Z
Delete for all of the reasons given above. ×Meegs 04:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Darn, I was hoping this would be a Wizard-of-Oz-related neo-religion. "The Yellow Brick Road will take us home to heaven, with Dark Side of the Moon playing," or some such. Delete anyway, per Quarl. Barno 16:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as protologism, renaming of Unitheism, itself a neologism on AfD. Both terms are Lindsay King's (User:Lindsayking and User:24.103.26.198 purport to be King) take on panentheism and the words are his attempts to differentiate it from the similar-sounding pantheism. -- Jonel | Speak 18:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete protologism. Wikipedia is not for promoting new words. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense and all of the above. DreamGuy 05:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.