Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Recall (music company)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Total Recall (music company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article written by company itself. No sources are provided, no notability is established (and it's barely established in the article). I could find no sources to prove that this company is notable and important; besides, the article is written by the company itself. Drmies (talk) 03:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: An A7 was declined a half a year ago on the grounds that the company acquired notability by acquiring a supposedly notable record label, Mille Plateaux. However, WP:Corp does not suggest that notability is inherited (from child to parent, in this case); moreover, the 'significant publication' requirement is still not fulfilled. Drmies (talk) 04:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The acquisition also means several artists came under the new combined label. Isn't having notable artists on the roster one of the key things to look for when assessing notability of a label? It might not be inherited but it's not lost either. (Also there are already several cases that show notability can be inherited - getting a notable award makes someone notable, or (a down/up example as here) bands with notable members are considered notable. - Mgm|(talk) 00:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:CORP. Possible Speedy. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: notability not established as per WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.