Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Project Control (TPC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G11) by Orangemike. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Total Project Control (TPC)[edit]

This feels as it stands very much like a spammy article placed here to publicise Devaux and his book. The term "Total Project Control" is one that gives many Ghits, but just how many are relevant to the article? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Almost none, and it's pretty obvious that TotalProjectControl(TPC) (talk · contribs) is a single-purpose account. However, Google Web is not the only place to look for sources for articles, especially for articles that alreday cite books as sources. Have you looked at the books? At least one of them is not by Devaux, according to the citation. Have you looked for other books?
This is a far better rationale than your rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expected project profit (EPP), by the way. You should replace the rationale at the latter with something such as the above. But you should still check the sources of articles that cite them. That's what readers are told to do, and we editors should be doing no less. Uncle G (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete, in fact, I think it could justify a speedy as G11., promotional only spam. .DGG (talk) 05:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.