Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Artist Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Total Artist Management[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist management company that fails WP:GNG. The sources provided in the article are all problematic: the first and last are listings of the company (zero depth of coverage), Discogs (also zero depth in this case) and AllMusic are unreliable and discuss the company's founder, not the company itself, and the rest are about the first band that the company represented but simply include a short quote of Warren Askew (the founder of the agency) without providing anything close to significant coverage of the company (or Askew). Pichpich (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Management. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails ORGCRIT. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn’t need to cover the company as he is the manager working on behalf of the company so by covering Warren Askew is covering the company, Also you have to keep in mind that managers represent the band so basically he is doing his job of covering the band not himself or the company as a manager that’s all he can do as he works for the band on behalf of the company, Many thanks. Punk Rock London (talk) 01:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* keep: meet all the requirements as a music manager on behalf of the company according to the Music Managers Forum, Please read the guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A04:4A43:429F:D4CE:C871:C1E7:4603:60D3 (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [reply]

- Comment I have struck the above comment as it appears to be a WP:LOUTSOCK of the article creator. This user has already made several disruptive edits, so feel free to report to ANI or AIV if any further disruption occurs. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep:It totally met all requirements to have a Wikipedia page as there's enough references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szilvia1234 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [reply]

I have struck the above comment as well. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Punk Rock London. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm unable to locate any sources that meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. Very little in general. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems like a WP:CORPDEPTH issue. No better way to highlight a lack of notability than sockpuppetry. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.