Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torx (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Torx (game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Prod'ed and deleted in 2008, the article was recreated by a now-indefinitely-blocked editor in 2009 and it has served as a magnet for this user's sockpuppetry efforts since then. It has been tagged as needing reliable sources on and off since 2009 and the only RSes that have emerged are first-party sources. Thibbs (talk) 11:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search brought up nothing usable. I found brief mentions here and there as a toy offered by Hasbro, but nothing that would be seen as in-depth. The majority of mentions were offhand, one sentence bits in Christmas lists, mostly of the "Hasbro has toys like this, this, and this for your tots" variety. I suppose that we could probably redirect it to List_of_Hasbro_toys#T, but I'd somewhat discourage that since Habro puts out a lot of toys and this list should be reserved for those toys that are notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. That it has a history of sockpuppetry only puts a cherry on top of things. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.