Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torre Premier Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 23:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Torre Premier Club

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted due to lack of notability and no reliable sources. I don’t see any reliable sources, but noticed there’s not enough notability for this article. Anyone agree with this? A2013a (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion page was created without the {{afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own at this time. @A2013a: For future AfD nominations, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 21:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 21:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 21:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. According to the photo the correct name should be Premiere, not Premier. Maybe somebody from Guatemala can clarify the naming. It's still the tallest building in the country. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Dr.KBAHT: you are correct, according to the developer's website; most other sources misspell it, though. Unfortunately, I am having a hard time locating RS for this article. The Spanish article has several references, but most of them are citing Wikipedia itself. I managed to find this archived newspaper note, will add it to the article... –FlyingAce^✈hello 20:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That newspaper article is good. It qualifies as RS because it's one of the main newspapers in the country. Moreover, I do think that the information about the tallest building is encyclopedic. Therefore, I'm updating my vote to keep the article. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per above comments it appears sourcing is available, and being the tallest building in Guatemala is a significant and interesting topic. NemesisAT (talk) 18:55, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A single source doesn't establish notability. Not to mention, even if we do keep it, the chance that this stub will become more then that, is very unlikely.--Filmomusico (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.