Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornado (Sonic the Hedgehog)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 22:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado (Sonic the Hedgehog)[edit]

This is a fictional vehicle that does not have real world information to establish notability. It is currently covered in Miles "Tails" Prower, and there is no current assertion for improvement. TTN (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See no chance of enough real world info ever, so frag David Fuchs^(talk) 21:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. TTN (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This item is too narrow in its coverage and can never satisfy the Wikiproject video games guidelines, see WP:GAMECRUFT. User:Krator (t c) 22:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Needs to establish notability to avoid deletion. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this article should be merged into Miles "Tails" Prower, for it is his plane. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FangzofBlood (talk • contribs) 23:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Agreed. Since it is his craft, it should be merged into his article, cuz it just ain't cuttin' it on its own. No doubt. ZeroGiga 00:25, 11 December 2007
Delete per nom and WP:NOT#GUIDE/WP:GAMECRUFT. --Jack Merridew 11:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would ask you to consider it that some of the information should be merged due to WP:REL. FangzofBlood 15:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Feel-free - now would be the best time to merge what you will. --Jack Merridew 11:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect. No real world content. Agree that it is gamecruft. Eusebeus (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per notability and verifiability with appearances in multiple media. The article is referenced, asserts notability, and is presented well. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.