Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 10 highest earning websites in 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: tagged as a copyright violation, deleted by User:RHaworth. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Top 10 highest earning websites in 2012

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dunno what criteria to use but I don't think worthy enough to be included --Ushau97 ^{talk contribs} 09:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article has many problems. It claims to be highest-earning websites, but its methodology isn't clear either on the page or in its source: it lists online retailers, companies who make money from advertising on their website, companies which primarily make money from other sources, like Reuters (which is primarily a news agency), and companies with multiple websites and other sources of income, like Google. A widely-discussed list from a reliable and authoritative source might be notable, but this isn't. It seems like an advert for somebody's Top 10 blog. If there's a good redirect target, fine, but deletion is otherwise the best option. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. The sole reference is to a "Top 10 Blog." Copying their list in their order might be a copyright violation. At any rate, the blog doesn't appear to be a reliable source. So tagged. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:35, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.