Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too small

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mind matrix 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too small

As far as I can tell this article has no foundation in reality. In mathematical terms, it is meaningless. Therefore it should be deleted. Stefán Ingi 09:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Complete, Total and Utter Bollocks. This proves that Wikipedia is unbounded, since for any stupid article x, there exists an even more stupid article y... Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 10:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Essexmutant 11:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This was marked for speedy deletion per CSD:G1 (patent nonsense) which it is not. (Patent nonsense is a jumble of characters and words with no meaning whatsoever.) I removed the tag. However I also vote to delete. Stifle 11:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Definition in my opinion should be - smaller than is usable, adjective describing something that is not large enough for some context. —the preceding unsigned comment is by 24.225.83.207 (talk • contribs) 11:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- jaredwf 14:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is totally useless as a reference article. -- (aeropagitica) 15:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Infinitesimal, maybe? -- Plutor 17:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete maybe, just maybe, Redirect as above. Dan 20:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no redir.--SarekOfVulcan 01:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no redirect. Infinitesimals denote quantities which are sufficiently small, not excessively small. Ryan Reich 01:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, do not redirect. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: too big. Charles Matthews 22:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just delete, no redirect. --C S (Talk) 09:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (I do feel it falls under CSD:G1/2, as well -- Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.) Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.