Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Sliwinski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Sliwinski

Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:N, WP:BLP. Could be redirected to Love Arcade if that article does not get deleted. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 00:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced BLP of an individual of marginal notability. RMHED (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional Disambiguous Page (RMHED, you knew damn well I would figure a way to make this complicated. ;) Seriously, this is likely the answer. Assuming the band he was a member of passes AFD (my guess is yes, they did release an album on a major label) then it would ok to just change to a disambiguous page. In the event that they didn't, then he doesn't have enough notability as a stand alone bio and a delete is in order. Then recreate the page for a different Tony Sliwinski, since I found tons of reliable sources for a doctor with the same name. This is why I would say disambig instead of a redirect. If it does go disambig, just ask and I will put up a stub for the doctor page, and yes, with sources. It appears the doctor does a lot of Erectile Dysfunction work and is easy to source. If we switch Tony's instead of a disambig page, it likely should be deleted to remove the history first. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 03:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to Delete While my above idea would have been valid if the band was notable, it was brought to my attention that they are likely NOT. Now a delete is in order, and then recreate the article with the more notable doctor. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 03:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.