Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Radevski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Aside from the nomination, no arguments for deletion have been presented in three weeks of this discussion being open. No prejudice towards a speedy renomination. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Radevski[edit]
- Tony Radevski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CREATIVE. yes he co-created 1 award winning film but that in itself isn't enough to pass WP:CREATIVE, he does not appear to have any other peer or industry recognition for his notability as director and very limited media coverage. [1]. LibStar (talk) 23:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 03:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, described in national press as having won multiple awards in field [2]. If winning one significant award is enough to demonstrate notability for a porn performer with only industry press coverage, it should be enough to demonstrate notability for a documentary filmmaker with mainstream national press coverage. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.