Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Myatt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Myatt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A radio presenter who doesn't appear to satisfy GNG. Tagged for notability since 2017. The one ref in the article is actually for another Tony Myatt who doesn't have an article and based upon W:Before is actually more notable. Szzuk (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG Mgbo120 (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 04:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable individual.--N Ø 17:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Literally nothing stated here is "inherently" notable for the purposes of securing his inclusion in Wikipedia, but there's no evidence of reliable source coverage about him being shown to get him over WP:GNG. I believe this is the first time I've ever seen a Wikipedia article whose only reference was sitting on the hatnote as evidence of the existence of somebody other than the article subject — and even that really shouldn't be there at all, because people who don't have Wikipedia articles to link to do not get disambiguatory hatnotes to distinguish themselves from people who do. Bearcat (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.