Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Capizzi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 18:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tony Capizzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Résumé-toned biography of a person with no strong claim of notability and no independent reliable sourcing to support it. The notability claims here are that he served on a city council and later as a county court judge -- but Dayton, OH is not a global city, so its city councillors are not automatically presumed notable just because they exist, and county court judges are not automatically presumed notable just because they have staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers. For either of these claims, the notability test is the ability to cite enough reliable source media coverage about them to get them over WP:GNG, not just the ability to primary source the fact that they exist. Bearcat (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:NORESUMES, plus it has been an unreferenced semi-stub for a while, averaging a minor edit or two per year. Not notable as per nom. GN-z11 ☎ ★ 17:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment And yet another that doesn't seem clear to me. I wouldn't have assumed he was particularly notable, but he's got more pageviews than most. Is that of any relevance to our thinking? valereee (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.