Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Brown (journalist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Endymion.12 (talk) 12:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Brown (journalist)[edit]

Tony Brown (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. NYT reference is trivial, and I couldn't find any decent sources establishing notability. Appears to be a minor conspiracy theorist. Endymion.12 (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – The New York Times piece is quite in-depth to be called trivial. As stated in the article in 1985 1982; “…Dapper, bespectacled and 48 years old, Tony Brown is the only black producer of a nationally televised serious black program, Tony Brown's Journal.” Believe this passes our Notability guidelines. ShoesssS Talk 20:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Shoessss: Where is that quote taken from? It's not from the NYT article cited. Endymion.12 (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The quote is from The New York Times, but from a different article than the one cited in the article. (Here is a link to it.) MarkZusab (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry I said 1985 it is actually 1982 [1] Sorry for the confusion. ShoesssS Talk 11:41, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as an obvious pass of WP:GNG and probably WP:AUTHOR as well. "I couldn't find any decent sources" is a statement about the nominator's capabilities, not the article subject's notability. Possible sources include Thomas, Keith L. (8 January 1989). "'Racism is green': Tony Brown: a talk show host who's not all talk". Chicago Tribune. p. J26., and Hasemyer, David (15 November 1995). "PBS' Tony Brown touts wisdom of racial accord". The San Diego Union-Tribune. p. B3., and the 1600-word profile Simmonds, Yussuf J. (7 January 2010). "Tony Brown". Los Angeles Sentinel. p. A12., and the 1800-word profile Higgins, Chester A, Sr. (6 November 1996). "Tony Brown had a vision". Michigan Chronicle. p. 7A.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link), or a front page Christian Science Monitor story (Marquand, Robert (23 August 1988). "Tony Brown: tough on whites and blacks". The Christian Science Monitor. p. A1.). I'll stop there, but please note that I formatted these with the cite template in case anyone wants to actually improve the article using the numerous available sources. Bakazaka (talk) 22:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep - Urban League's distinguished service award, JET 100 most influential Black Americans of 1977, dean of the school of communications at Howard University in the early 1970s, co-organizer of a MLK march in Detroit in 1963, Host of the at the time longest running black affairs show on television, the list goes on and on. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:13, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notable journalist, has own notable show, one of his books was notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note So I have clearly made a mistake by only performing a cursory google search before nominating this article. Would someone perhaps like to use the references listed above to actually improve the article? Unfortunately I have neither the time nor the interest to do so. Endymion.12 (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.