Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonny Fisker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tonny Fisker[edit]

Tonny Fisker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBADMINTON and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete — Per nomination. The subject does neither meet WP:NBADMINTON, nor WP:GNG. As for the sources available in the article, I'm afraid I cannot confirm if all they are reliable enough, though various sources lack to provide a significant coverage of the subject:
[1] — has lengthy quotes from Fisker, none of which helped me in determining of he is notable.
[2] — passing mention, I guess.
[3] — I can't access it
[4] — Page number not mentioned. Upon searching, it appears to be 17. Passing mention that he won bronze medal. Also, a primary source.
[5] — this appears to be a source giving significant coverage, but it in Sermitsiaq (newspaper), a regional newspaper. I doubt if it contributed towards GNG.
[6] — passing mention
[7] — foreign source, so I cannot access the content to accurately judge the content. Though, it being from Kalaallit Nunaata Radioa makes it bit reliable, I think.
[8] — I see not mention of the subject at all.
[9] — passing mention.
Apart from these, I wan't able to find many other sources. So, I think that article should be deleted. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.