Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toni Scullion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Toni Scullion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear why this person is notable. She seem to have won a large number of awards that are of unclear notability from a small number of organizations, and founded an organization and festival that are also of unclear notability. I have had difficulty finding mentions of her in WP:RS's. Phuzion (talk) 03:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG and WP:BASIC: "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability," because WP:RS exist, e.g. Daily Record 2017, Edinburgh News 2018, The National 2018, Daily Record 2019, The Scotsman 2019, Insider.co.uk 2019, West Lothian News 2019, Edinburgh News 2019, FutureScot 2019 Beccaynr (talk) 00:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as above, Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
keep, quite a large number of recognition and awards. Needs some cleanup, WP:RESUME applies here. --hroest 21:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to have sufficient coverage. Does need some tidying, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Because it not fail gng yet.--by Alcremie (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.