Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toni-Marie Wiseman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toni-Marie Wiseman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a single-station television journalist, whose strongest claim to passing WP:JOURNALIST is winning a "Best Local TV Personality" reader poll in an alt-weekly ten years ago. As is so often the case, this reads far more like a résumé than an encyclopedia article -- and outside of the blurb in the reader poll, the sourcing here is entirely primary with no evidence of reliable source coverage to get her over WP:GNG. As always, local television journalists are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- RS coverage about them, in media other than their own paycheck provider, that supports a JOURNALIST pass must be present for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 01:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete journalists connected with only one local station are almost never notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable news anchor that fails GNG. My searches do not turn up anything better than what's already in the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.