Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toneshifterz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Toneshifterz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Sources provided are primarily social media, I could not locate additional reliable sources. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is a lot out there, and this person looks as though they should be notable, but I cannot find anything like IRSS to support it. I found one interview - which is really a primary, and some introparas on several sites which were very basic and all identical. Aoziwe (talk) 10:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:MUSICBIO. no notable albums nor notable awards. LibStar (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.