Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomotherapy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per consensus (NAC, will add "sources" tag). American Eagle (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tomotherapy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Advertisement? (changed from prod to AfD) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable topic, verifiable sources. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this is a medical therapy -- Google Scholar lists over 3600 papers. However, the article seems to be conflating the generic medical term 'tomotherapy' (lower case) with 'TomoTherapy' (mixed case), which appears to be a trademark. A bit of a rewrite and some culling appears to be required here. Some sources would help as well. —BillC talk 01:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable. Plenty of refs available .Not every article that talks about a product is an advertisement. DGG (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If i need radiation I wish to know my options...Turqoise127 (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Pubmed has more than 400 related articles. NCurse work 06:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.