Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Novak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Novak[edit]

Tommy Novak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 09:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Whenever I see a stub article on a minor-league, high school or amateur hockey player that claims the player won some minor honor, I think "Must be one of Dolovis'." In this case, as unfortunately usual, I'm right. Fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence of meeting the GNG beyond routine sports coverage explicitly debarred by WP:ROUTINE. Ravenswing 10:59, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 19:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 19:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Articles seems to be premature to be here. Not enough sources to verify. Zedopuppy (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.