Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommaso Ceccarelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tommaso Ceccarelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Has not appeared in a match in a fully professional league yet. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 01:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 14:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - same reasons as GiantSnowman. Adam4267 (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 14:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plays for a notable side so i think its a keep from me. Tony (talk) 16:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of the player passing WP:BIO. As to footballing notability, WP:NFOOTBALL states explicitly that being registered to a notable team isn't enough: "A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable." The player has to play, and Mr Ceccarelli hasn't, yet. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in addition to being an unreferenced BLP, the player in question has not played in a fully pro league, nor has he received significant coverage, meaning he fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.