Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Ugly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mgm|(talk) 13:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tom Ugly[edit]
- Tom Ugly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, self-professed "up and coming" band, written as a promo Closedmouth (talk) 10:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'd say that they'd meet criteria 11 of WP:BAND by being a next crop artist on Triple J and maybe 9 for their unearthed, although the high school qualifier might diminish it's notability. By coincidence I did hear one of their songs today in the car! Needs a lot of editing, but that isn't a reason for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 15:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, probably just scrape through on criteria 11 of WP:MUSIC, due to the Unearthed win (winners of this competition get national airplay on the Australian Triple J radio network). Article does need a bit of a rewrite though. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC, but I agree with Lankiveil, it does need a rewrite. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep National rotation on Triple J [1] Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.