Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Stevenson
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tom Stevenson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not assert notability as per WP:BIO. αѕєηιηє t/c 17:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Tom Stevenson is a wine writer. I added a mention of his 30+ wine writing awards, and at the time of nomination (2 minutes after the creation of the article stub) the article already e.g. clearly stated him as the editor of a major wine encyclopedia. Tomas e (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep, the nomination is not too deeply checked. The article subject is an obvious pass of WP:N, mentioned in a host of WP:RS, many references surely to follow. MURGH disc. 21:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - plenty of WP:RS already in article, just his work with Decanter (one of the three most important periodicals in the wine industry globally) alone would justify the keep. FlagSteward (talk) 00:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, people should do some homework before nominating an article for deletion, he is notable, plenty of references.Callelinea (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.