Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Parker (information security)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Parker (information security)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tidied this up and then got to wondering. Not notable as far as I can see, though it's not my specialist subject. Article has existed for 9 years now and makes no claim of notability, Only references are passing mentions in the media, none of which are about him, and many are almost certainly promotional. Many dead links. Emeraude (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See updates.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.178.184 (talk) 22:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seen them. Now unreferenced entirely. Still no evidence of notability. Emeraude (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 05:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly self-promotional Skirts89 (talk) 19:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article seems to be promotional in nature, and otherwise not notable. Also doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG guidelines as I didn't find any independent sources. Jebcubed (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article has no sources. Subject doesn't appear notable. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as PROMO for a non-notable "computer security author, technologist and investor." Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.