Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Guerra (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Guerra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not pass notability guidelines Wolfson5 (talk) 04:10, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article was already deemed worthy of keeping when it was first nominated for deletion in 2016. The voters at that time concluded that sources were available and what the article really needed was to be cleaned up and expanded. I see no evidence that this conclusion would be any different now. While the article has had clean-up notices for a few years, that is not a reason to delete, per WP:IMPERFECT and WP:HANDLE, among others. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:26, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable, but needs cleanup.

The vote above was by User:Ortizesp. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Guerra passes wp:gng per coverage in independent and reliable sources. Zingarese (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More in-depth discussion needed on notability. The first nomination was a NAC and no one demonstrated how the subject is notable. One of them presented a source which is now a dead link. The main point in the first nomination is WP:NOTCLEANUP and it is also brought up here. It would be useful if the keep voters present some actual sources rather than just say sources exist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, » Z0 | talk 08:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Vote Above: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the more than sufficient coverage set out in either GNG or NMUSIC (sources available either in article or by the list by DarkOrchid - though GDPR concerns will prevent access for some of us) Nosebagbear (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.