Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Gray (archaeologist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lucy (Australopithecus)#Discovery. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 17:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Gray (archaeologist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable/WP:BLP1E. There are passing mentions of a graduate student named Tom Gray in accounts of the discovery of the fossil Lucy, but I can't find a single mention of the name after that. – Joe (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Notable for one thing only but i think a redirect would be better then a delete. GuzzyG (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
redirect I agree with GuzzyG. I don't think there's enough for an article on him, but a redirect seems better than a delete.Sandals1 (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.