Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Borrill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tom Borrill[edit]
- Tom Borrill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Football player who has not played at a fully professional level. Doesn't meet WP:N or WP:ATHLETE guidelines. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --Jimbo[online] 12:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete footballer fails WP:ATH as he has not played at a fully-pro level. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage. --Jimbo[online] 12:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete insufficient WP:RS to pass WP:ATHLETE -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 15:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Having never played proffessionally, he fails WP:ATHLETE, and the absence significant coverage means this article does not merit keeping under WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.